PERI-EDU University Education · Recorded lecture

Complete blood count-derived inflammatory indices combine routine neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte and platelet counts into ratios or composite measures. They may describe a patient’s systemic inflammatory background, but they do not identify the anatomical source of inflammation and cannot diagnose peri-implantitis.

Event9th Congress of the Polish Dental Association
SessionPERI-EDU panel: Periimplantitis
Date19 September 2026

PERI-EDU lecture by Victor Geller on blood-derived inflammatory indices in peri-implant disease

What the indices represent

Circulating leukocytes and platelets participate in immune defence, inflammatory signalling and tissue repair. Combining their counts can amplify patterns that may be less evident when each cell type is viewed separately. These measures are inexpensive and easy to calculate, which makes them attractive for observational research.

Index Calculation General interpretation
NLR Neutrophils ÷ lymphocytes Balance between innate inflammatory activity and lymphocyte-related immune regulation.
PLR Platelets ÷ lymphocytes Platelet-associated inflammatory and vascular context relative to lymphocytes.
MLR Monocytes ÷ lymphocytes Monocyte-related inflammatory activity relative to lymphocyte count.
SII Platelets × neutrophils ÷ lymphocytes Composite measure integrating three circulating cell populations.
SIRI Neutrophils × monocytes ÷ lymphocytes Composite measure of neutrophil- and monocyte-related systemic inflammation.
AISI / PIV Neutrophils × monocytes × platelets ÷ lymphocytes Higher-order composite index; terminology and reporting conventions must be stated clearly.

Why interpretation requires caution

These indices are non-specific. Age, obesity, smoking, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, acute infection, malignancy, medication, physiological stress and the timing of blood collection may influence cell counts. A high value therefore cannot be assigned to peri-implant inflammation without considering the complete medical and clinical context.

Published cut-off values are population- and outcome-dependent. Differences in study design, laboratory methods, disease definitions and adjustment for confounders make it inappropriate to transfer one threshold directly into routine implant practice.

Local diagnosis remains primary

Peri-implantitis is diagnosed through clinical evidence of inflammation together with progressive loss of supporting bone. The core assessment includes bleeding on probing, suppuration, probing depth and its change from baseline, the mucosal margin, plaque-retentive factors and radiographic bone levels. Blood-derived indices cannot replace these findings.

Appropriate role: CBC-derived indices are best treated as research variables or contextual systemic markers. They may help explore relationships between local peri-implant disease and systemic inflammation, monitor patterns in defined study populations or support hypothesis generation. They are not stand-alone screening tests, severity scores or treatment-selection tools.

A responsible interpretation sequence

  1. Confirm that the blood count is technically valid and review the absolute cell counts.
  2. Check for acute infection, medication effects, smoking and relevant systemic conditions.
  3. Calculate indices using explicitly reported formulas and consistent units.
  4. Interpret the result against an appropriate reference population, not a universal cut-off.
  5. Keep local peri-implant diagnosis separate from systemic inflammatory context.
  6. In research, adjust analyses for major confounders and avoid causal conclusions from cross-sectional associations.

Recorded conference lecture

In this PERI-EDU lecture, Victor Geller, MSc, biotechnologist, presents current concepts concerning inflammatory biomarkers in blood and their use in assessing inflammation associated with peri-implant tissues.

Watch the lecture on YouTube

Funding: This work was co-funded by the European Union under grant agreement No. 2024-1-PL01-KA220-HED-000251208.

Disclaimer: Co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the Foundation for the Development of the Education System (FRSE). Neither the European Union nor FRSE can be held responsible for them.